Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the County Finance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Greenup County accepts historic sheriffs excess-fees payment; part moved for loan repayment

Greenup County Fiscal Court · March 10, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Sheriff Matt Smith delivered a record $353,707.84 in excess fees to the fiscal court; the court allocated $150,000 for an annual loan repayment and moved $203,707.84 into excess-fees funds. Related disbursement checks and a treasurer budget amendment were approved.

Sheriff Matt Smith delivered what county officials called the largest excess-fees payment in Greenup County history: $353,707.84, presented to the fiscal court during its March 10 meeting.

"Again, this is the largest check-in the history of Greenup County to come back to the fiscal court from the Sheriff's Office: $353,707.84," Judge Bobby Hall read and the court accepted the check. By motion and voice vote the court directed $150,000 of the amount to a yearly loan repayment with the sheriff's office and moved the remaining $203,707.84 into excess-fees funds.

The court also accepted a related disbursement check for $353,422.20. Treasurer Sharon Bates reported that the general fund will be increased by $202,104.06 to account for excess fees, and she proposed several interfund transfers the court approved (including general to road $100,000; general to jail $200,000; general to 9-1-1 $150,000).

County Attorney Matthew Warnick separately asked the court to authorize Judge Hall to enter a separate opioid-litigation settlement to ensure Greenup County receives its portion; the court approved that authorization. Officials said the excess-fees funds will help cover rising costs and recent disaster-response needs but provided no long-term allocation plan at the meeting.

The court approved the financial items by voice vote. Details such as how the excess-fees balance will be allocated in future budgets were not specified at the meeting.