Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Infrastructure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Butler County engineer reports 65 flood‑affected locations, Greene bridge concrete pour planned

Butler County Board of Supervisors · June 11, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

County Engineer John Riherd told supervisors on June 11 that a FEMA damage assessment identified 65 locations needing attention after last month's flooding; concrete will be poured this week for the Greene bridge but officials advised against opening the bridge before Greene River Days. Riherd also outlined local road and grant discussions, and a potential T16 replacement with a 70% county share.

County Engineer John Riherd updated the Butler County Board of Supervisors on June 11 about flood damage, bridge work and local road projects.

Riherd said a FEMA damage assessment submitted after last month’s flooding identified 65 locations that "required attention during the flooding." He said concrete will be poured this week for the Greene bridge but that officials advised the city not to open the structure to traffic before Greene River Days.

Riherd described ongoing planning and coordination: he has discussed New Hartford flooding with Dan Gillis and said a study is underway to evaluate better flood management there. He said he has met with the City of Shell Rock and with the railroad to continue discussions on a project that may be eligible for grant funding. Riherd also reported meeting with the City of Dumont about replacing County Road T16; he said the county’s share would be about 70 percent, which could leave a significant cost burden for the city given T16’s width and function.

The engineer’s update focused on immediate flood repairs and project coordination with neighboring cities and rail partners. The board did not take separate formal action on these items during the meeting; they were presented as operational updates.