Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Sevier County commission approves five rezoning measures in combined vote

Sevier County Commission · March 1, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Sevier County Commission combined five rezoning resolutions into a single roll-call vote and approved all measures (23 yes, 2 absent). The changes affect parcels along Katy Hollar Rd, Mill Creek Rd, Rock Gardens Unit 5, and Jack Delozier Dr and were recommended for approval by local planning commissions.

The Sevier County Commission on Oct. 17 combined and approved five separate zoning amendments in a single roll-call vote, with 23 commissioners voting yes and two absent.

The measures included rezoning Tax Map 134 Parcel 51.00 (3848 Katy Hollar Rd) from A-1 (agricultural) to C-1 (rural commercial) at the request of Burke McCandless Jr; Tax Map 105 Parcel 67.00 (818 Mill Creek Rd) requested by Kathy Turner; Tax Map 105 Parcel 92.00 (494 Mill Creek Rd) requested by Hanna Dover; rezoning all parcels within Rock Gardens Unit 5 from R-1 (rural residential) to R-2 (high-density residential) requested by Stonehedge Partnership/Billy Proffitt; and rezoning Tax Map 62 parcels 69.01, 69.07 and 69.14 from R-1 to I-1 (industrial) along Jack Delozier Dr requested by the Sevier County Economic Development Council. Each item carried a planning commission recommendation in favor of approval.

Commissioner Kent Woods moved to combine the five rezonings into a single consideration; Commissioner Gary Cole seconded the motion. James Temple, Jr., Interim Department Head of Planning and Zoning, registered no objection before the vote proceeded.

The combined action means each parcel’s zoning designation will be updated as approved; the transcribed record does not include ordinance or resolution numbers or a stated effective date for the changes. The planning staff recommendation and the unanimous recorded support among present commissioners indicate the changes will be reflected in county records following administrative processing.