Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tax Levy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Tax-levy amendment approved after debate, motion to delay fails
Summary
Commissioners debated whether to delay a proposed tax-levy increase and ultimately approved an amendment to the levy; a conflict‑of‑interest allegation was raised during the exchange.
Get email alerts on the Tax Levy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A contested exchange over the county tax levy marked the Loudon County Commission’s June 24 meeting, but commissioners ultimately approved an amendment to the levy after voting down a motion to delay consideration.
Accounts-and-budgets Director Erin Rice presented the staff-recommended levy. Commissioner Quillen moved to delay any increase until independent feasibility and traffic studies were completed; Commissioner Jenkins seconded. The motion to delay failed on roll call (4 ayes, 6 nays, one abstention).
Following that vote, Commissioner Whitfield moved to amend the levy ordinance to change the county’s combined property-tax rate and to increase the debt-service rate. That amendment passed on a roll-call vote (6 ayes to 4 nays, with one abstention) and was recorded as Resolution QG,2424-13.
The debate included a formal accusation from Commissioner Jenkins that Commissioner Greaves had a conflict of interest and had not read a statement of conflict. The transcript records Jenkins’s statement and a subsequent motion to reconsider the prior vote; the minutes show the commission proceeded to re-vote portions of the levy package. The transcript does not include a separate statement from Commissioner Greaves responding to the conflict allegation.
The precise numeric dollar figure for the amended combined property tax rate is garbled in the meeting transcript and therefore not specified in this report; the transcript does record an increase in the debt-service rate from '13 to 36 pennies' in the amendment language.
What happens next The tax-levy amendment takes effect with the adopted budget cycle starting July 1; county staff will publish final levy-rate documentation. The transcript does not provide final printed tax-rate language due to garbling of numeric characters in the recording.
