Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ems Creation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cumberland County commission opposes Crossville plan for separate municipal EMS
Summary
The commission unanimously adopted a resolution expressing opposition to the City of Crossville creating its own municipal Emergency Medical Service, citing potential loss of county transport revenue, tax increases and response-time concerns.
The Cumberland County Board of Commissioners voted unanimously Sept. 15 to express strong opposition to the City of Crossville creating a separate municipal Emergency Medical Service.
Commissioner Colleen Mall, who introduced Resolution 09-2025-21, said the county should have been consulted before any city actions were taken. Commissioner John Patterson seconded the motion. During discussion County Mayor Allen Foster and several commissioners warned that a municipal EMS could reduce county revenue derived from patient transports and potentially require higher city property taxes to cover service costs.
Commissioner Darrell Threet asked how a new city EMS would affect county residents; Commissioner Patterson noted concerns he had discussed with Chris Miller about response times to taxpayers. Commissioner Nancy Hyder highlighted that Cumberland County EMS is a “class A award-winning department,” signaling confidence in existing county services.
The resolution, which expresses opposition at this time to the creation of a municipal EMS by the City of Crossville, passed by unanimous roll call vote. The measure does not legally prevent the city from proceeding; it communicates the county’s position and notes potential fiscal and service impacts the commission believes require further intergovernmental discussion.
Why it matters: creation of a city EMS could shift emergency medical transport revenue and affect service delivery across city–county boundaries. The commission’s resolution signals formal concern and seeks further dialogue between county and city officials.
Next steps: The resolution requests attention and discussion but did not direct staff to take specific enforcement or legal action; future coordination between the county and city is likely if the city proceeds.
