Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procurement Licensing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Tift County to place routine facilities, consulting and licensing items on consent agenda, including restaurant alcohol license
Summary
Commissioners agreed to place routine procurement items — carpet and painting contracts, a recreation consultant agreement — and an alcohol license application for Amar Indian Restaurant on the regular-session consent agenda; staff recommended local vendors where applicable and verified requirements for the license.
At the April 8 work session the Tift County Board of Commissioners indicated it would place several routine items on the regular-session consent agenda for the April 8 meeting.
Public Works Director Jason Jordan said Webb's Floor Covering submitted the lowest quote to replace carpet at the Ag Extension Office at $19,278 and staff recommended accepting that bid. Jordan also reported three quotes to paint the interior of the Drivers License Services building: the lowest bid was $18,250 from GA's Best Painters (Norcross), but staff recommended awarding to local firm Dependable Paint Company for $18,350 to support a local business.
Assistant County Manager Mike Walker recommended contracting with local consultant Craig Sowell to provide recreation consulting services to ensure EB Hamilton operates as intended after a multi-year renovation moves from construction to program/operations. The board indicated support for placing that item on the consent agenda.
County Clerk Miriam Jordan reported an alcohol beverage application from Tajallah Rashid for Amar Indian Restaurant at 3121 S Central Ave, Suite G seeking a consumption license for malt beverage, wine and distilled spirits. Jordan said Community Development verified the restaurant met the 30-seat requirement, the Tax Commissioner verified no outstanding taxes, and the sheriff recommended approval; the board directed staff to place the application on the consent agenda.
These items were presented as routine procurement and licensing matters; no formal votes or contract executions occurred at the work session.
