Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Voter Rolls topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Irwin County board sustains challenge to voter flagged as registered in Florida and Georgia

Irwin County Board of Elections & Registrations · July 1, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board sustained a challenge to a voter whose registration appeared on both Irwin County and Hillsborough County, FL rolls; the board recommended removing the never-used local registration and voted 2-0 to sustain the challenge.

The Irwin County Board of Elections & Registrations on July 30 sustained a challenge to a voter record after interstate information sharing flagged the same individual on rolls in Florida. Representative Patricia Thurman moved to sustain the challenge; Vice-Chair Charlene Hutchinson seconded and the motion carried 2-0.

Election Supervisor Ethan Compton told the board that the alert came through a new information-sharing agreement between the Georgia and Florida Secretaries of State. Supervisor Compton said the voter (listed in the record as 10801459, Douglas Ray Harris) first appeared on Irwin County rolls via automatic Department of Driver Services registration in 2016, had a precinct card returned as undeliverable and was moved to inactive status, and was later returned to active status manually in December 2019 because a final inactivity notice had been improperly processed by a former clerk. Compton stated that, under existing federal procedures, the Irwin County registration should have been moved to canceled status in January 2020.

Given the voter is actively registered in Hillsborough County, Florida, the board recommended removing the Irwin County registration, which the board characterized as never used, to prevent the voter from facing potential investigations or double-registration issues in either state. The motion to sustain the challenge and remove the Irwin County registration carried 2-0.

The transcript records no contrary testimony or appeal in the meeting; the board did not record any additional procedural steps or a timeline for notifying the voter in the meeting notes.