Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ordinance 119 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board schedules public hearings on rewritten Code Enforcement Ordinance 119 after counsel adds abatement tools
Summary
County Counsel presented a rewritten Ordinance 119 to address court-enforceability and expand abatement and receivership options; commissioners raised questions about definitions and funding and agreed to public hearings on Nov. 4 and Dec. 2, 2025.
County Counsel Paige Sully told the Lake County Board of Commissioners on Oct. 15 that she had rewritten Ordinance 119 to address enforcement gaps identified after the county lost a prior court challenge.
Sully said the draft ordinance broadens definitions of health and safety nuisances and includes abatement and receivership provisions to give county authorities legal tools to address chronic nuisance properties. Vice‑Chair Barry Shullanberger noted the county previously lost in court and urged a tougher enforcement posture; he said some other counties were more aggressive on nuisance enforcement.
Commissioner James Williams raised questions about specific definitions — including whether abandoned vehicles on private property would be covered and how to limit the number of vehicles — and Sully said she would research clearer definitions. Chair Mark Albertson asked how fine and fee revenue would be handled; Sully said matters rarely reach the stage of fines but that a hearings officer would oversee cases that advanced to that point and any fees would depend on issue scope.
The board gave consensus to publish notice for public hearings on Nov. 4 and Dec. 2, 2025, to take public testimony and consider final adoption.
What’s next: County Counsel will refine definitions (for example, abandoned vehicles) based on commissioner feedback before the public hearings.
