Madison County Board approves $58,870 emergency payment for VAC legal bill after heated debate
Loading...
Summary
The Board approved a $58,870.46 immediate emergency appropriation to pay a 2016 Veterans’ Assistance Commission legal bill (warrant 16‑5) after an extended debate over whether the payment aids veterans or simply covers legal fees; the measure passed on a 25‑2 roll call.
Madison County Board members voted 25‑2 on April 17 to adopt an immediate emergency appropriation of $58,870.46 to pay an unpaid legal invoice (VAC warrant 16‑5) for the Veterans’ Assistance Commission (VAC).
The appropriation was presented by the Finance and Executive Committees as an emergency action tied to the Fiscal Year 2016 budget. Opponents said the payment would chiefly compensate an attorney rather than directly help veterans; supporters, including VAC staff, said the litigation vindicated veterans’ rights and that the County had discretion under applicable law.
The debate focused on legal precedent and policy. Board member Tom McRae asked whether the bill had been discussed previously and about the required supermajority for emergency appropriations. County counsel clarified the matter of voting thresholds and the Board discussed the practical costs of continued litigation if the bill remained unpaid.
Vac Director Mr. Lavite urged the Board to consider the broader implications for veterans, describing his own experience with post‑traumatic stress disorder and the decision to pursue litigation when other remedies were not available. “No Veteran asks for PTSD,” he said, and framed the legal action as a means to vindicate veterans’ rights and prevent further harm.
Opponents raised concerns that the funds would go to the lawyer rather than to services for veterans. “I’m all about the Veterans; I’m not about paying lawyers for frivolous lawsuits,” County Board member Mr. Parkinson said during debate, urging caution before setting a precedent.
The Board voted by roll call: AYES 25, NAYS 2 (Hankins and Gorman). The resolution directs the payment of VAC warrant 16‑5 to Burkhart Law Office and was adopted as an immediate emergency appropriation.
Next steps: The County will process the payment per the resolution; Board members who opposed the measure said they expect the VAC and the County to clarify how legal spending is managed going forward.