Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procurement Security topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Tift County staff recommend MCA Avigilon-compatible system for Gazette renovation to preserve county standards
Summary
Project staff recommended buying a surveillance system from Mobile Communications America for $42,798.41 to match county standards rather than accepting the contractor’s specified system; McWright offered a higher-cost Avigilon option or removing the system from contract bids.
Get email alerts on the Procurement Security topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County Manager Jim Carter and Public Works Director Jason Jordan told commissioners on Nov. 4 that the Gazette renovation contractor’s bid included a different surveillance provider than the county-standard Avigilon equipment. McWright, the contractor, offered two options: (1) supply Avigilon equipment through McWright with a contract increase of $48,211 (raising the system cost to $85,885.81) or (2) remove the surveillance system from the original contract so the county could procure it separately.
Staff obtained quotes from Mobile Communications America (MCA) and presented two MCA alternatives: (a) supply the same system quoted by McWright for $56,725.46 or (b) supply a system with reduced server storage capacity matching current county specifications for $42,798.41. Staff recommended purchasing the MCA system priced at $42,798.41 and removing the surveillance system from McWright’s contract, to be handled by the county through a change order at the project’s end.
The board indicated it would place the procurement recommendation on the Nov. 10 consent agenda; no formal vote or public comment occurred in the work session. The work-session record does not include technical details about storage capacity differences beyond staff’s statement that the lower-cost MCA option would match current county server specifications.
