Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Predator Control topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
USDA reports wolf mitigation work in Lake County, warns committee funds near depletion
Summary
A USDA Wildlife Services update to the Lake County Board reported more than 781 personnel hours on non‑lethal wolf mitigation and said county Wolf Committee funds are nearly exhausted; commissioners discussed funding models ranging from producer co‑ops to predator districts.
Hunter Moyles of USDA Wildlife Services told the Lake County Board of Commissioners on April 22 that non‑lethal and traditional predator‑control work in the county has included more than 781 personnel hours over the past four months, with roughly $40,000 spent on non‑lethal measures funded by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 1 federal non‑lethal initiative funds.
Moyles said staff used electric‑fence protectors with red flags — a technique he described in the report as "flaggery" — and that deterrents are more effective in smaller pastures because wolves often circumvent fences rather than breach them. He highlighted ongoing camera monitoring and dynamic placement of deterrents as key operational needs.
On funding, Moyles told commissioners the Lake County Wolf Committee held about $5,700 as of April 7, but after recent work in Fort Rock and Silver Lake the committee estimates the balance is closer to $3,500 and expects funds to last through June. He said traditional predator projects (including contractor work on coyote and raven control) and carcass‑disposal efforts represent ongoing cost pressures: two flights removed 288 coyotes this season, and federal offsets helped reduce contractor expenses on the raven work.
Moyles gave the board a county‑wide minimum wolf count of 204 animals and said there are seven established packs; eight packs are required to move the state management plan to its next phase, which he estimated is about three years away. He described a Defenders of Wildlife partnership to collect and transport carcasses to Klamath County’s landfill and noted the county lacks a similar disposal site, which can draw predators to carcasses and complicate local management.
Commissioners pressed Moyles on funding options. He reviewed models used in other Oregon counties — a producer assessment used by Coos County, a county‑funded model used by Jackson County, and a predator district in Klamath County akin to vector control — and cautioned that establishing a district requires a time‑consuming public process. Commissioners also suggested a producer association or co‑op might face less resistance than an ordinance‑based fee. The board did not adopt a new funding mechanism at the meeting and asked staff to continue exploring options.
The board was also briefed on aircraft costs (Moyles cited about $6,500 for two flights) and the limits of aerial methods, with agreement that ground methods and producer contributions would remain important. Moyles encouraged the public to report wolf sightings to the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife to improve population estimates.
The board did not take formal action beyond discussion; staff will return with any proposals for local funding mechanisms or program changes.
