Madison County Board rejects proposed COVID‑era comp‑time plan after hours of debate
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
Subscribe
Summary
A revised resolution authorizing additional comp‑time and benefits for several county offices during the COVID‑19 response failed on April 15 after members debated whether unions had negotiated alternate agreements and whether the county could afford the $380,599.66 liability the resolution referenced.
Madison County Board members debated a revised resolution on April 15 that would have authorized additional comp‑time and benefits outside of collective bargaining agreements for the auditor, state’s attorney, sheriff and recorder during the county’s COVID‑19 response. After extended discussion and competing motions, the board did not adopt the resolution.
Don Moore, a finance committee member who spoke for the resolution’s sponsors, said the item was intended to authorize benefits described in the attached COVID‑19 Additional Benefits Report and identified a county liability figure of at least $380,599.66 in the resolution text. Board members disagreed over whether unions had already negotiated a separate memorandum of understanding that changed the county’s exposure.
State’s Attorney Thomas D. Gibbons told the board committees do not take final action on resolutions and that any committee recommendation must still be decided by the full board.
Major Connor, representing the Sheriff’s Department, said the department negotiated with the union over the weekend and replaced a proposed paid comp‑time approach with a personal‑leave system that does not create the same payroll liability. “We are removing all of the comp‑times that’s been added … and that is being removed from the payroll because we are going to switch to personal leave,” Major Connor said.
The board first considered a motion to postpone consideration for one month; that motion failed on a roll call (AYES 13, NAYS 14, ABSTENTIONS 1). Later, a motion to adopt the revised resolution failed decisively (AYES 1, NAYS 25, ABSTENTIONS 2). Several board members cited budget pressure from the pandemic and urged caution about authorizing large new liabilities while sales tax and other revenues were under stress.
What the vote means: The resolution as written was not approved. The transcript records that at least one department (the Sheriff’s) and union representatives negotiated a different MOU over the weekend to address leave and use‑it‑or‑lose‑it time; the board requested any new or revised agreements be returned for committee and board review rather than adopt the original resolution.
No personnel actions or payouts were recorded as approved in the meeting minutes; board discussion signaled an expectation that negotiated MOUs will be presented later for committee review.