Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning Height topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Soddy‑Daisy moves to allow taller hotels, apartments — fire chief says city has ladder capacity

Board of Commissioners of the City of Soddy-Daisy, Tennessee · March 1, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission approved a first reading to amend height limits so hotels and multi‑family buildings may reach 75 feet; Fire Chief Morgan said the department's new 95‑foot aerial equipment and sprinkler requirements make the change acceptable.

The Soddy‑Daisy Board of Commissioners on Jan. 19 approved a first reading to amend the city's zoning ordinance to allow hotels and multi‑family structures to reach 75 feet from ground to roof peak, up from the current 35‑foot (2½ story) limit.

Public Works Director Steve Grant said the change is limited to hotels and apartment buildings and is intended to accommodate five‑story developments. Grant told the board that he and Fire Chief Morgan had discussed safety needs. "Fire Chief Morgan felt that with the recent purchase of a 95 foot aerial this height would be acceptable," Grant said.

When Commissioner Keith asked about maximum allowable height, Grant reiterated the proposed 75‑foot limit, and Fire Chief Morgan confirmed the department has apparatus to protect structures at that height. Grant also noted that such hotels or multi‑family buildings would be required to have sprinklers throughout, and Commissioner Keith added that fire hookups on the building would be required.

City Manager Johnson said most hotels are five stories and the change "would provide the opportunity for one to locate within the City." The Planning Commission had recommended approval; the board passed the first reading unanimously.

The ordinance will return for subsequent readings before final adoption; staff noted additional fire‑safety and permitting requirements would apply to any proposed building at the new height.