Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Energy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Charlotte County sends BESS zoning back to Planning Commission to review fire risk, Tier 1 rules and decommissioning

Charlotte County Board of Supervisors · March 1, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Board unanimously adopted a resolution referring Battery Energy Storage System zoning regulations back to the Planning Commission to obtain fire-department input, consider rules for Tier 1 systems (600 kWh or less) and address decommissioning; a recommendation is expected within 100 days of the next Planning Commission meeting.

The Charlotte County Board of Supervisors on March 12 adopted a resolution formally referring proposed zoning regulations for Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) back to the Planning Commission for further review. The referral asks the Planning Commission to: solicit input from the county’s seven fire department chiefs about fire risks and whether the county or applicants/operators should address those risks; develop regulations for Tier 1 systems (those 600 kWh or less); and create decommissioning requirements.

The motion to adopt the resolution was made by Supervisor Derek Toombs and seconded by Supervisor Noah Davis and carried with all supervisors present voting aye. The resolution notes that the Planning Commission previously completed a review and recommended further study of these three issues; the Board referenced Virginia Code § 15.2-2286 and expects a recommendation within 100 days of the next Planning Commission meeting in accordance with Virginia Code § 15.2-2285.

What happens next: the Planning Commission will gather the requested input and prepare a recommendation addressing the three topics; the board’s resolution sets expectations for a timely report back to the Board. No timetable for adoption of ordinance changes was specified during the meeting.