Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Route 151 Truck Restriction topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County staff recommends not pursuing formal Route 151 through‑truck restriction; Board to pursue other measures
Summary
Staff analysis found Route 151 and the proposed alternates do not meet VDOT criteria (residential density and functional classification), so Nelson County will not forward a formal through‑truck restriction request; supervisors discussed speed reductions, roundabouts and enforcement instead.
After reviewing Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) guidelines and GIS analyses, Nelson County staff recommended on Nov. 14 that the Board not pursue a formal through‑truck restriction on Route 151.
County staff analyzed two proposed restriction corridors and their alternate routes against Commonwealth Transportation Board criteria, which require both: (1) a reasonable alternate route and (2) incompatibility of truck traffic with the affected area, plus either (3) a residential character or (4) a local/collector functional classification. Staff reported that proposed routes are classified as minor arterials and GIS mapping did not show the dwelling density needed to meet the residential‑character test. The staff conclusion was that criteria 3 and 4 could not be met and therefore the formal restriction was unlikely to succeed.
Stephen Bayne, who spoke during the public comment period, told the Board he believed the staff analysis overstated the time benefit by setting the northern termini at Route 250 in Afton rather than at Interstate 64 exit 99; he urged a more thorough review with VDOT. Bayne also said VDOT had been "very forthcoming" and willing to help the County evaluate safety concerns.
Supervisors discussed alternative measures: staff has requested a speed reduction from 55 to 50 mph for a segment of Route 151, noted CTB‑funded roundabouts in engineering at key intersections, and encouraged continued enforcement and traffic‑calming measures. Dr. Jessica L. Ligon and other board members stressed that engineering changes and enforcement are among the realistic near‑term tools.
Board members did not pursue a formal restriction request at this meeting and instead directed staff to continue coordination with VDOT and consider engineering, enforcement and signage options.
