Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Site Plans And Replats topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Multiple commercial site plans and a replat return for technical revisions; applicants asked to provide permits and easements
Summary
At the October 15 meeting commissioners reviewed the Sally warehouse, Barrett commercial buildings, the King replat, and Pepper Source parking-lot plans; staff identified missing permits, buffering/setback issues, and easement documentation and asked applicants to return in three weeks with corrections.
The Planning Commission reviewed multiple commercial site plans and a replat on October 15 and identified similar follow-ups: updated engineering comments, stormwater/DEQ permits, confirmed utility service letters, buffering/setback compliance or waiver requests, and recorded easement documentation.
Sally Warehouse (case 25354): Tracy said the most recent site plan had not been distributed to Garver but the applicant reported they have addressed DRC comments in the latest submittal. The project proposes a ~45,000-square-foot warehouse with office area and requires an ADEQ stormwater permit and utility approvals. The applicant said RDOT requested a small easement at the highway intersection and the church near the property had agreed.
Barrett (case 25391): The applicant seeks to build two commercial flex buildings. Staff noted missing drainage documents (later submitted to DEQ), buffering that may or may not be met by existing tree lines, and the need for septic/well-abandonment proof. The applicant said stormwater permit materials had been submitted and will address buffering and loading-area labeling.
King replat (cases 25393 & 25394): Online representatives described combining a portion of a platted lot with an adjoining tract and requesting vacation of an inactive utility easement; staff asked for recorded power and access easements to be shown on the revised plat and the property owner confirmed deeded access. The applicant will provide revisions and return.
Pepper Source (case 25407): The proposal for a 222-space employee parking lot is a new site plan submittal because a prior approval had lapsed. Staff required an ADQ large construction stormwater permit and Benton County Road Department permits; applicant said previous approvals remain valid in substance and will return with outstanding items addressed.
None of these items received final approval at the meeting; staff and applicants agreed to return in three weeks with the requested documentation and revisions.
