Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Canterbury Plan topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Councilperson Smiley presents Canterbury village plan to add 56 dwelling units in New Castle County

New Castle County Land Use Committee · February 3, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At the New Castle County Land Use Committee meeting on Feb. 3, Councilperson Smiley described a proposal to expand the Plan of Village at Canterbury (Taylor Town Section C) with two four-story apartment buildings totaling 56 dwelling units, additional garages, storage units and a small community-center addition; no public opposition was recorded at the planning board or at the committee meeting.

At the New Castle County Land Use Committee meeting on February 3, Councilperson Smiley described a proposed expansion of the Plan of Village at Canterbury in Taylor Town Section C that would add housing to an existing apartment complex.

Co-Chair Janet Kilpatrick opened the meeting, conducted a roll call of members present and asked for a motion to approve the posted agenda; the motion was seconded and approved by voice vote. Kilpatrick then introduced a resolution describing the Canterbury proposal: two four‑story apartment buildings containing 56 dwelling units, five detached garages (seven spaces per building, 35 total), two approximately 2,500‑square‑foot one‑story storage units, and a roughly 700–750‑square‑foot addition to an existing community center at the northwesterly corner of Smalley’s Dam Road and Newtown Road in Newcastle Hundred.

"I've had no calls about this at all," Councilperson Smiley said, summarizing the outreach and hearing history. He told the committee that no one appeared at the planning board meeting to contest the proposal and described the site history: when the complex was built, he said, DelDOT had appropriated a portion of the property for a potential future road that was never constructed and that parcel has since been returned to the property. "So now we're gonna build on it and add some additional apartments and housing," he said.

Kilpatrick and committee members did not record additional questions or a formal vote on the Canterbury resolution in the committee minutes provided in the transcript. The committee solicited public comment and none was offered during the meeting.

The meeting proceeded to adjournment after a motion, second and a voice vote. No additional materials, revisions to the proposal, or next procedural steps for the Canterbury resolution are recorded in the available transcript.