Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lemon Grove school board unanimously approves series of resolutions, vendor pools, contracts and deputy superintendent agreement
Summary
At its Aug. 13 meeting the Lemon Grove School District Governing Board unanimously approved multiple resolutions designating authorized representatives for county programs, added vendor pools for inspection and geotechnical services, approved a roofing contract for Lemon Grove Academy Middle School and approved an employment agreement for the deputy superintendent (name not specified).
The Lemon Grove School District Governing Board unanimously approved a package of resolutions, vendor lists, contracts and an employment agreement at its regular meeting on Aug. 13, 2024.
The board voted 5–0 to adopt Resolution 2024-25-07, authorizing district representatives to the San Diego County Schools Risk Management Joint Powers Authority for workers’ compensation, property and liability and other authorized plans; Resolution 2024-25-08, to designate representatives to the San Diego County Schools Fringe Benefit Consortium; and Resolution 2024-25-09, naming district representatives to the Office of Public School Construction and the State Allocation Board. The board also approved Resolution 2024-25-10 to establish temporary interfund transfers of special or restricted fund monies. Each motion was moved and seconded as recorded in the meeting minutes and carried unanimously.
Board members approved additions to the district’s pre-qualified vendor lists, including a pool of providers for Department of State Architect (DSA) inspection services and a pool for geotechnical, soils/materials and special inspection services, intended to support upcoming facilities and capital projects.
The board approved a field services contract, not to exceed $60,000, with Roof Construction for roofing work at Lemon Grove Academy Middle School. The motion was carried 5–0.
Separately, the board approved an employment agreement for the deputy superintendent. The meeting transcript does not specify the appointee’s name in open session; the motion text and vote were recorded as approved 5–0.
The meeting also included approval of a broad consent agenda (items B–U) covering minutes, personnel actions, warrants, contract ratifications and renewals, student-teacher and intern agreements with local universities, and a set of vendor and program contracts. The consent agenda was approved by a 5–0 vote.
No members of the public addressed the board during public-comment periods associated with these items. The board had met in closed session earlier in the evening to discuss personnel and anticipated litigation under Government Code §§54956.9 and 54957 and reported that no action had been taken in closed session.
What’s next: The approvals clear the way for several facilities-related projects and administrative staffing steps; specific implementation dates, contractor amounts beyond the $60,000 roofing threshold, and the name of the deputy superintendent were not specified in the open-session transcript.
