Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Rezoning Startown topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Newton council denies rezoning for 75-home subdivision on Startown Road after public pushback

Newton City Council · March 1, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Newton City Council voted unanimously Jan. 7 to deny a rezoning request from Mungo Homes that would have allowed 75 single-family homes on a 25.22-acre Gaither property on Startown Road, citing lot compatibility, drainage and traffic concerns raised by residents and the Planning Commission.

Newton City Council voted unanimously Jan. 7 to deny a rezoning request filed by Mungo Homes that would have allowed 75 single-family homes on a 25.22-acre tract on Startown Road.

Assistant Planner Alex Fulbright told the council the applicant sought PD-H zoning to build 75 homes with about 48.6% open space; the proposal would require annexation and an estimated 1,300 linear feet of water main to serve the site. He said the plan shows one external access point to Startown Road and noted Startown Road’s recent Average Annual Daily Traffic count remained around 9,000 vehicles per day.

The Planning Commission had recommended denial, citing compatibility with surrounding lot sizes and traffic impacts. During the public hearing, several residents urged council to reject the rezoning. Joe Fulbright said traffic on Startown Road has worsened and asked when the last NCDOT traffic study was done. Sean Clark said the land was originally sold with an expectation it would be preserved. Tim Eberley told council he opposed the request and said, “Mungo homes build defective homes and is not approved by BBB.” Supporters of the project included a speaker who said deed transfers alleviated privacy concerns and that the development would add housing choice.

Mayor Pro Tem John Stiver moved to deny the rezoning, citing (1) the Planning Commission’s unanimous recommendation to deny, (2) proposed lots that are significantly smaller than the surrounding neighborhood, and (3) negative traffic impacts. Council Member Ed Sain seconded the motion and the council voted to deny the request. The motion was recorded as unanimously RESOLVED.

Planning Director Randy Williams told council that a voluntary annexation tied to the site was withdrawn by the applicant.

The decision ends the current application; any future development proposals would require separate filings and public notice.