Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council debates mutual-aid language and automatic-aid wording tied to ISO insurance rating
Summary
Council members debated language in a regional mutual-aid agreement and whether to keep an "automatic aid" provision that could help lower the town's ISO insurance rating but also trigger costly engine responses; the council voted to move the draft forward for John's review.
Council members spent an extended portion of the meeting debating language in a proposed mutual-aid agreement intended to help lower the town's Insurance Services Office (ISO) rating.
The chair asked the council to consider moving the draft agreement forward for review by John; the motion to proceed passed without recorded opposition. During subsequent discussion, the sheriff cautioned that an ``automatic aid'' provision could be costly and unnecessary in some circumstances: ``The the this whole automatic aid, it just doesn't make sense, financially,'' the sheriff said, adding that automatic paged responses can waste taxpayer money and personnel time when incidents turn out to be minor. The sheriff also said some structure alarms are dispatched as structure fires when they are not, and described the fiscal and personnel burden of deploying larger engines to nonstructural incidents.
Other members said automatic aid provisions are often a condition for lowering an ISO rating and could reduce local insurance costs if properly structured. One council member noted: "Most of the reason that they're doing these is because of the ISO," and said they were trying to lower the town's rating to reduce property insurance costs.
The council discussed alternatives to "automatic" language, including phrasing that would allow mutual-aid requests without mandating simultaneous automatic dispatches of all agencies. The chair asked members and affected staff to meet (including Chris and Junior) to draft alternative wording and to review insurance implications uncovered in conversations with local agents.
The motion to proceed with the agreement pending John's review carried. Council members agreed further drafting would aim to preserve ISO benefits while limiting unnecessary engine deployments and costs.
The council did not vote on final mutual-aid language at this meeting; members directed staff and key responders to refine the wording and return it for future consideration.
