Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procurement Technology topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Jefferson County Board of Education approves $1.25 million first-year contract with Tyler Technologies for new ERP
Summary
The Jefferson County Board of Education on Dec. 11 approved a three-year contract with Tyler Technologies to install an enterprise resource planning system, with first-year costs of about $1.25 million and recurring fees thereafter; funding will come from the district general fund.
Get email alerts on the Procurement Technology topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Jefferson County Board of Education voted unanimously Dec. 11 to approve a three-year agreement with Tyler Technologies to provide an enterprise resource planning (ERP) system that will replace the district’s current finance and human resources software.
Board member Walter Curry moved to approve the agreement and Carita Venable seconded; all four members present voted yes. The contract begins Jan. 1, 2026. The district reported an approximate first-year total cost of $1,247,272, composed of one-time costs totaling $1,100,031 (including implementation costs listed at $850,254 and estimated travel of $249,777) and recurring costs of $147,241.50, described as 25% of the total cost for subsequent years. The funding source for the contract was listed as the general fund.
District administrators said the ERP will provide finance and human-resources solutions to replace current software; no vote tally beyond the unanimous board vote was recorded in the meeting minutes. The board did not specify further implementation milestones, performance guarantees, or an exact multi-year budget forecast in the presented materials.
The board approved the motion during the finance agenda; the minutes state the recommendation was presented for review and approval and that the motion carried unanimously. The agenda also recorded that technology procurement and future contract oversight will continue to be managed through regular committee processes.
The board did not provide additional public comment on vendor selection during the meeting. The district listed the general fund as the funding source and provided the cost breakdown in the agenda packet.
