Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Prosper planning commission tables Frontier Gateway preliminary site plan, asks for enforceable ‘gateway’ standards
Summary
After a developer presentation emphasizing high-end materials, open space and tenant restrictions, the Prosper Planning & Zoning Commission voted to table the Frontier Gateway preliminary site plan to March 3 so staff and the applicant can pursue enforceable design and use commitments via PD zoning or a development agreement.
Get email alerts on the Land Use Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Prosper Planning & Zoning Commission on Jan. 20 tabled consideration of a preliminary site plan for the Frontier Gateway retail development after commissioners pressed the developer and staff for stronger, enforceable guarantees of “gateway-quality” architecture and use restrictions.
The developer, Urban Heights managing partner Sagar Kalaprol, told commissioners the proposal would use high-end materials — ‘‘natural stone, brick, and glass facades’’ — include varied building heights and nearly 184,000 square feet of open space, and exclude low-quality uses such as gas stations, discount stores, check-cashing outlets and auto dealers. He said the project would create roughly 550–650 jobs for Prosper residents and projected about $1.5 million in annual sales tax at stabilization.
Commissioners said they welcomed the design goals but questioned whether the one-story, retail-heavy preliminary site plan would deliver the long-term, mixed-use gateway the developer described. Multiple commissioners asked how the town could ensure the material standards and forbidden uses would be built and maintained. "I think my overarching question here ... is what guarantees us that the materials and the uses ... are actually enforceable," said a commissioner during the exchange.
Town staff told the commission that the most reliable way to codify permitted uses and enforce aesthetics is either to rezone the site to a planned development (PD) and pair that with a development agreement or to use PD zoning to list specific permitted and prohibited uses in the zoning itself. Staff said the conceptual PD process and the preliminary site plan could be coordinated so the commission would not necessarily face two separate hearings if the applicant chooses that route.
Scott Rogers, a broker with 2 West Realty who worked on the project’s market analysis, told the commission retail demand in North Collin County is strong and that retail is currently more marketable than speculative office: "North Collin County's vacancy rate's 2.2%," he said while explaining why the team is prioritizing retail as a catalytic first phase.
After extended questioning about phasing, urban design and the legal mechanism to secure commitments, Commissioner Carson moved to table the item to the commission’s first March meeting to allow staff and the applicant to draft PD/development-agreement language and possible site revisions. Commissioner Butler seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
The commission did not vote on the substantive site plan; the applicant left the meeting with direction to work with staff on zoning pathway options and more explicit phasing and design commitments. The item is scheduled for return to the commission on March 3, unless the applicant requests a different date.
