Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Licensing Discipline topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission votes to revoke Class 3 certification for employee Miguel Aragon over pending criminal charges

Washington State Gambling Commission · March 12, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission voted to revoke a Class 3 employee certification for Miguel Aragon after staff presented court records showing child‑molestation charges and reported the tribal license suspension; staff recommended revocation under RCW and WAC authority and the motion passed by voice vote.

The Washington State Gambling Commission voted on March 12 to revoke a Class 3 employee certification held by Miguel Aragon after staff presented certified court records and recommended revocation.

Adam Amerine, legal and records manager, told the commission the agency received a criminal history affidavit and later obtained certified court records showing probable cause for two counts of child molestation filed July 2, 2025; he said the Muckleshoot Tribal Gaming Agency suspended the individual’s tribal gaming license. Amerine said the executive director issued administrative charges in January alleging the licensee "poses a clear threat to the effective regulation of gambling" and that the commission is authorized to revoke a Class 3 certification under cited RCW and WAC provisions.

Following staff presentation, a commissioner moved to revoke Aragon's Class 3 certification (identification number provided in the packet). The motion was seconded, commissioners voted 'aye' by voice vote and the chair announced the motion passed.

The commission's action is recorded as a formal license revocation; staff said the licensee had not responded to the charges at the time of the meeting. The record and staff memo cited specific RCW and WAC provisions supporting revocation authority.