Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Dental Contract topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves dental hygienist contract after split vote; members debated lower‑cost alternatives
Summary
After extended discussion comparing mobile dental providers and program scope, the board voted separately on the dental hygienist contract (item 14.10.5). The motion carried despite several 'no' votes; members who opposed cited cost and urged consideration of lower‑priced providers.
The board voted to approve the dental hygienist contract (item 14.10.5) after a separate roll‑call vote and an extended discussion on provider options.
Mrs. Plank provided comparative information on available vendors, describing differences between "mobile dentist" services and a provider called Family First. She said mobile dentist can bring more comprehensive on‑site clinical services (exams, minor fillings, X‑rays) and that mandated screening would cost the district about $20 per student for the district‑funded portion; Family First structures screening sessions differently and quoted approximately $7.50 per session for required screenings. Mrs. Plank said both options could offer cost savings versus the district's existing $7,500 arrangement with the current hygienist provider.
Board members who favored keeping the incumbent said continuity and familiarity with students mattered. Board members who opposed the contract cited fiscal stewardship and encouraged selecting a lower‑cost provider if services were equivalent. One board member noted that "where I go to the dentist it just recently changed hands and you never see the same person twice" to illustrate concerns about provider turnover, while another said the smaller savings would still be worthwhile to demonstrate to taxpayers.
Roll call on the dental hygienist contract recorded the following votes as read at the meeting: Missus Krauss: Yes; Miss Jalal: Yes; Missus Hollowell: Yes; Mister Ladey: Aye; Mister Lustig: No; Missus Plank: No; Mister Waller: Yes; Miss Young Clover: No; Mister Bridal: Yes. The meeting record indicates the motion "does carry." The board then voted on the remaining consent items as a group and approved them by roll call.
The vote resolved the immediate contract question; board members requested staff follow up with details about what preventive services (such as topical fluoride) would be included, parental consent procedures and whether emergency services are available under alternative vendor arrangements. The board did not amend the contract at the meeting.
Next steps: staff to implement the contracted services as approved and provide clarifications to the board on scope, consent forms and any emergency‑service limitations.
