Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Cannabis Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Cannabis advisory task force urges city preparation if adult‑use bill passes

Virginia Beach City Council · January 14, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Cannabis Advisory Task Force presented 17 recommendations on zoning, public safety, outreach and equity as state legislation moves; the task force warned of a likely large first wave of applications and urged the city to prepare rapid review procedures, first‑responder training and social‑equity supports.

Andy Locke, former chair of the Cannabis Advisory Task Force, briefed council on the group’s recommendations and the likely near‑term timetable if the General Assembly enacts adult‑use legislation.

Locke said medical cannabis is legal in Virginia and that prior 'Rouse' bills were repeatedly before the legislature; he said the Joint Legislative Commission (JLC) has recommended changes and that a revised bill could be signed this year. "Assuming the bill is finalized, approved by the legislature and the governor signs, adult use could go into effect as early as September 2026," Locke said.

He outlined 17 city considerations grouped under public safety, community outreach and zoning. On public safety and administration, he told council the Cannabis Control Authority would handle most statewide oversight but localities retain zoning, signage, the ability to object to license applications and options on taxation and fees. Locke warned the city will likely have just days to accept or object when applications arrive: "they will be forwarded to the city, which will then have 3 days to accept or object to the application," he said, urging cross‑departmental readiness.

Council members pressed on impaired‑driving enforcement and the limits of current testing technology, zoning buffers and density caps, and whether the Rouse bill or JLC language would allow local opt‑out. Locke recommended that the city consider overlay districts, distance requirements (Rouse set 1,000 feet; JLC recommended 1 mile) and whether to reserve licenses or technical assistance for microbusinesses and social‑equity applicants.

Locke also recommended investments in youth‑prevention education, first‑responder training (including drug‑driving response) and planning for private consumption venues and ticketed adult‑only events if the legislation permits. He told council the Rouse bill allowed localities to tax retail sales (up to 2.5%) and that the JLC had recommended 3.5% and additional fees could be considered.

Council members generally welcomed the task force’s preparatory work but emphasized that final action should follow review of the enacted bill language and requested staff analysis of resourcing and zoning options prior to any formal city policy decisions.