Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Farmington Council denies rezone for 40-acre Farmington Reserve over safety and drainage concerns
Summary
After a public hearing with multiple neighbors citing flooding, steep slopes and fault-line risk, the Farmington City Council voted 4-1 to deny a developer's request to rezone roughly 40 acres from Agriculture-Foothill to Large Residential-Foothill, blocking denser subdivision plans and sending the applicant back to the drawing board.
Mayor Brett Anderson presided as the Farmington City Council on Feb. 17 refused a rezone request for roughly 40 acres east of 200 East, citing public safety and drainage concerns raised by nearby residents and some councilmembers.
The proposal, brought by applicant Mike Falk, would have changed the land's zoning from Agriculture-Foothill to Large Residential-Foothill and allowed smaller lots under a schematic subdivision. Community Development Director Lyle Gibson told the Council the Planning Commission and the Development Review Committee had reviewed the application and that the DRC believed the property could be serviced as proposed. Gibson also noted that the first iteration of the project with smaller lots had been denied previously.
The rezone drew sustained public opposition. Paul Bredthauer told the Council, "the current drainage in the area can't handle what is already there," and several neighbors submitted video and testimony documenting recurring flooding and concerns about erosion and fault lines. Other residents cited potential light pollution and the long-term loss of open space.
Council debate split along competing priorities of property rights and safety. Councilmember Scott Isaacson said he had walked the site and was "at this point ... opposed to the rezone," citing slope, seismic and landslide risks and saying he was not persuaded the site was safe for denser housing. By contrast, Councilmember Roger Child argued developers have rights to pursue due diligence and said he was "in favor of the rezone so the applicant can move forward with additional due diligence" to resolve technical questions.
After discussion, Mayor Pro Tempore/Councilmember Amy Shumway moved to deny the enabling ordinance and development agreement; Councilmember Scott Isaacson seconded. The motion passed 4-1, with Councilmember Roger Child casting the lone "nay." The Council's findings stated the requested zoning "will not facilitate the use of property or development that is desirable at the subject location."
What happens next: denial of the rezone means the developer retains the property's current rights under the Agriculture-Foothill designation and may pursue alternatives that conform to that zoning. The Council record indicates further technical studies (geotechnical, drainage) would be necessary before a similar rezone could be reconsidered; the transcript does not specify any immediate follow-up action or appeal timeline.
The action closed a contentious public hearing in which neighbors urged the Council to prioritize safety and drainage over increased density.
