Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Defense says jury instructions let prosecutors avoid proving who did what in Alvarez drive-by case

Utah Court of Appeals · January 8, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

In State v. Alvarez, defense counsel argued that the jury instructions combined party liability and felony-discharge elements and allowed conviction on recklessness or alternatives without specific unanimity about each defendant's role; the State replied that the instructions tracked precedent and the record shows strong evidence of intent.

At oral argument in State v. Alvarez, Spencer Brown, counsel for Rosalio Alvarez, told the Utah Court of Appeals that the jury instructions permitted the prosecutor to obtain convictions without proving the specific role each defendant played in the charged drive-by shooting. "Those instructions allowed the prosecutor to argue that she did not have to prove what role any of the defendants played," Brown said, adding that the instruction conflated party liability and the predicate mens rea for felony discharge.

Brown argued trial counsel were ineffective for failing to request clearer…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans