Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Court hears arguments on tracing and valuation of trust assets on remand in Dahl v. Dahl
Summary
On remand from the Utah Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals heard argument over whether the district court properly identified and valued trust assets for distribution to Kim Dahl, including disputes over commingling, traceability of premarital funds, discovery limits, dissipation claims and whether valuation should use a 2010 date or a post-remand/current valuation.
The Utah Court of Appeals heard oral argument in Dahl v. Dahl (No. 20240740), a remand-focused dispute about what trust property should be characterized as marital property and how it should be valued. Counsel for appellant Kim Dahl, Steve Christensen, said the Supreme Court directed the district court to identify trust assets that should be returned or credited to Ms. Dahl and argued the lower court improperly treated the task as too difficult because of alleged commingling and by restricting post-2010 discovery.
Christensen…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
