Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Court of Appeals hears Park City boundary dispute over misplaced subdivision pin
Summary
A three-judge panel heard oral argument in a Park City boundary dispute centered on a 7-foot survey-pin error and competing legal theories — quiet title via a 'monument' rule versus boundary-by-acquiescence — and took the case under advisement for a written opinion.
The Utah Court of Appeals heard oral argument Wednesday in a property dispute arising from a survey error in the Reisner Ridge Subdivision that left a narrow triangular strip of land—about 160 feet long and roughly 7 to 7.5 feet wide—contested by neighboring owners.
Rodney Parker, counsel for the appellants, said the dispute began with monuments placed when the subdivision was created and that a 2020 survey showed a front pin about seven feet west of where the plat and course-and-distance calls indicated it should be. "That's what we're fighting over is this triangular piece of property, 160 feet long and approximately 7 or 7 and a half feet wide," Parker told the panel.
Parker asked the court to sustain the appellants' quiet-title theory,…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
