Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Finance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Cramerton audit returns clean opinion; one significant deficiency requires LGC response

Town of Cramerton Board of Commissioners · March 1, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Martin Starnes & Associates presented a clean (unmodified) audit for the Town of Cramerton showing a $1.4 million increase in fund balance, higher revenues, and one significant deficiency that requires a board‑signed response to the Local Government Commission within 60 days.

Martin Starnes & Associates presented the Town of Cramerton’s 2024 audited financial statements at the Nov. 19 workshop and issued a clean, unmodified opinion, indicating no material misstatements in the financial statements.

Audit highlights reported by Ms. Johnson included: General Fund revenues increased by $1.8 million (25%), driven by higher property tax revenue, permits, fees and intergovernmental revenue; expenditures decreased by $1.4 million (16%) largely because of a decline in capital outlay and debt service; total fund balance increased by $1.4 million (31%); and available fund balance by Town policy is approximately $1.5 million, or about 62.27% of expenditures (roughly eight months of operating expenses).

The audit identified one significant deficiency; the firm asked that the Town submit a written response to the North Carolina Local Government Commission (LGC) within 60 days, signed by a majority of the Board of Commissioners.

Town Manager Zach Ollis credited both revenue growth and cost‑saving measures for the surplus. He cited an example in which a water restoration project originally budgeted at $500,000 was completed for $5,000 through in‑house analysis and negotiations; that figure was presented by the Manager as an example of resourcefulness. The audit presentation otherwise noted a stable property tax collection rate and non‑material budgetary violations.

Board members thanked the auditor and Finance Director Michelle for the audit and asked no questions during the presentation; follow‑up questions were directed to Finance Director Michelle. The board must sign the required LGC response within 60 days to address the identified deficiency.

Next steps: Staff will prepare the Town’s response to the LGC and provide materials to the board for signature and any requested follow‑up.