Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Comprehensive Plan Amendment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning Commission adds adjacent parcel and schedules Feb. 11 hearing for Evans Plaza comprehensive plan amendment

Planning Commission · January 14, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Bellevue Planning Commission accepted staff’s recommendation to expand the geographic scope of a privately initiated Evans Plaza comprehensive plan amendment by one adjacent half‑acre parcel and directed staff to schedule a threshold‑review public hearing for Feb. 11, 2026.

The Bellevue Planning Commission voted on Jan. 14 to include an immediately adjacent half‑acre parcel in the geographic scope of a privately initiated comprehensive plan amendment for Evans Plaza and to schedule a threshold‑review public hearing for Feb. 11, 2026.

Staff planner Steven Tun introduced the application as a map amendment proposing to change roughly 10 acres at Evans Plaza from "general commercial" to "low‑rise to mixed use," which would allow residential development in an area that today is primarily one‑story commercial retail and services. Tun described the two‑step privately initiated amendment process — first a threshold review to decide whether the item should be added to the annual work program, then a merits review if it proceeds — and said staff recommended including one adjacent corner parcel to make the future land‑use map read coherently.

"Tonight is really like an introduction on the geographic scope," Tun told the commission, noting that adding a small adjacent parcel was intended to avoid leaving a single, isolated parcel with a different long‑range designation.

Commissioners asked whether expanding the scope would force owners to redevelop, whether owners could opt out, and whether a larger scope would trigger broader environmental review (SEPA). Staff replied that rezoning and redevelopment would remain voluntary: a map change does not compel an owner to pursue a rezone or redevelopment, but adding additional parcels can increase the scale of environmental analysis and the study area staff must evaluate.

Commissioner Farris moved to accept staff’s recommendation to include the one adjacent parcel; the motion was seconded and approved by voice vote. Commissioner Farris then moved to direct staff to schedule the threshold‑review public hearing on Feb. 11; that motion also passed by voice vote. The meeting transcript records the motions passing by unanimous voice vote but does not include a roll‑call tally.

Next steps: staff will post notice of the Feb. 11 threshold‑review public hearing and continue public outreach and noticing consistent with the comprehensive plan amendment process. If the commission forwards a recommendation and the council agrees to include the application in the annual work program, the proposal will proceed to merits review and any subsequent rezoning would be an optional, later step for property owners.

Authorities and procedural references include the city’s comprehensive plan process for privately initiated amendments and notice procedures described by staff; the commission also cited city public‑comment rules under ordinance 6,752.