Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Religious Expression Schools topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Panel approves resolution to ask Florida voters to enshrine protections for religious expression in schools, 17-1
Summary
The subcommittee reported favorably HJR 583, a proposed constitutional amendment to protect religious expression in public schools; supporters said statutes can be changed and voters should decide, while opponents called the measure unnecessary and voiced concerns about privileging certain faiths.
Get email alerts on the Religious Expression Schools topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Florida House Education Administration Subcommittee voted 17-1 to report favorably HJR 583, a joint resolution that would place a proposed constitutional protection of religious expression in public schools before voters.
Representative Tremont, a sponsor, told the committee the resolution "simply give[s] the voters an opportunity to enshrine our most cherished and sacred rights" and argued constitutional language provides longer-term protection than statutes. "All of this is in state statute right now," he said, "...my argument would be that that protecting religious liberty and expression is arguably the most necessary thing to do."
Opponents and supporters both testified in person. Devin Graham, representing American Atheists, called the resolution unnecessary and warned it could be used to advance particular religious agendas. "This bill is not necessary," Graham told the committee, and urged lawmakers to focus instead on teacher retention and school funding for public schools.
John Labriola, representing the Christian Family Coalition of Florida, urged support, saying constitutional language would reduce confusion in school administrations and better protect students who face harassment for expressing religious beliefs.
During debate Representative Nixon said she was "torn" and raised concerns that language could affect curriculum and be used to push views that conflict with science; she ultimately registered the single recorded nay. Other members, including Representatives Aristide, Woodson, Alvarez and Black, said the resolution is meant to protect students of all faiths and cited past incidents where students or coaches faced discipline over religious expression.
By roll call the committee recorded 17 yeas and 1 nay; the chair announced HJR 583 was reported favorably and will proceed to the next legislative step. The resolution text and any ballot language were not amended in the committee hearing; multiple members asked for continued clarification that the measure protects all religions and beliefs.
