Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Swim Lesson Voucher Reform topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rep. Kendall moves to shift swim-lesson voucher ages to 1 to 7, citing drowning concerns
Summary
Rep. Kendall told the Florida House health care budget subcommittee that House Bill 85 would change the swim-lesson voucher program eligibility from ages 0–4 to 1–7 to improve program efficiency and reduce drownings; the subcommittee reported the bill favorably.
Representative Kendall presented House Bill 85 to the Florida House health care budget subcommittee, saying the measure would change the swim-lesson voucher program’s eligible ages "from ages 0 to 4 to 1 to 7." The bill’s sponsor said the change is intended to make the program more efficient and better targeted to children who can benefit from instruction.
Kendall said a 15-year-old constituent who volunteers as a swim instructor brought the idea and stakeholders were consulted. "All it does is simply shift the ages from ages 0 to 4 to 1 to 7," Kendall said. She argued children younger than 1 display reflexive motions that resemble swimming but are too young to lift their heads and breathe reliably, and that infant drowning deaths under age 1 largely occur in bathtubs in the home.
Kendall also cited data she said shows drownings for ages 4–12 in Florida have doubled over the past decade and said "one third of those children in Florida that have drowned have been children with autism," adding that the share grows older than 5. She framed the change as a way to avoid duplicative instruction and allow voucher resources to be used where they are most effective.
Representative Rosenwald asked whether state departments or program administrators would change outreach, marketing or delivery to reflect the new eligibility. Kendall said stakeholders such as the YMCA have proposed options including splitting vouchers so they can be shared across sessions, offering group lessons and allowing local providers to implement the program in different ways to extend reach.
With no public testimony and no amendments, Kendall closed debate. The clerk called the roll and the subcommittee recorded the measure as reported favorably. The chair announced the bill was shown "reported favorably" by the subcommittee; no dissenting votes were recorded in the transcript.
The subcommittee’s action sends House Bill 85 forward for further consideration under the legislative process.
