Author lays over bill to ban firearms on Capitol complex after extended debate on safety and access
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
Subscribe
Summary
Sen. Westlund proposed prohibiting permit-to-carry firearms on the Capitol complex (with limited carve-outs); proponents cited an Axel Group security assessment and rising threats to lawmakers, while opponents argued the ban would disarm staff and visitors during vulnerable transitions; the sponsor laid the bill over for future consideration.
Sen. Westlund opened discussion of SF 3631 by pointing to a recent rise in threats to elected officials and a security assessment that concluded Minnesota’s capitol complex has among the least restrictive entry conditions compared with other states. The bill would prohibit permit-to-carry firearms on the Capitol complex while creating a narrow carve-out for certain retired peace officers employed in primary security functions and allowing secured storage in vehicles in limited circumstances.
Supporters cited the Axel Group assessment, increased threats elevated to the BCA, and the safety of thousands of schoolchildren and visitors who tour the Capitol each year. ‘‘We have a duty and obligation to not be lagging behind what other states have already done,’’ the sponsor said.
Opponents, including an attorney for the National Rifle Association, urged preserving ‘‘capital carry’’ and said Minnesota’s open-access traditions are valuable; several senators raised concerns about staff, lobbyists and employees who work late hours and walk to distant parking lots, arguing disarming them could increase vulnerability during transitions. Senators also discussed whether private security or trunk storage is feasible and the limits of security patrols.
After extensive back-and-forth and without a committee vote, Sen. Westlund, as chief author, indicated her intention to lay the bill over for further consideration. The committee adjourned after scheduling its next hearing.