Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Insurance Renewal topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Carter County reviews insurance renewal as adjusters find storm damage across county buildings
Summary
County officials were briefed on an insurance renewal that includes higher liability exposure, a $25,000 per-building deductible, a separate cyber policy and an inspection that found roof damage on multiple county properties including the hospital; the commission agreed to wait for adjuster estimates before authorizing repairs.
Carter County commissioners spent the bulk of the meeting reviewing an insurance renewal proposal and recent storm damage to county properties. A presenter for the renewal (identified in the transcript as Speaker 6) said the county’s property schedule lists roughly $40–41 million in buildings and contents, noted a typical 3% escalator, and described key changes in deductibles and coverages that will affect next year’s premium.
The presenter told commissioners that the property deductible is $25,000 per building and that auto and physical-damage deductibles have increased in some lines (auto deductible referenced moving toward $2,500 from $1,000). He described liability limits at $1,000,000 per occurrence with a $5,000,000 umbrella, for a combined potential limit of about $6.5 million, and warned that law-enforcement liability nationally is a growing exposure that could affect local pricing.
Separately, the presenter said cyber liability has been separated from the Travelers package and placed with a specialized carrier (named in the transcript as Calbel); he recommended the county adopt cyber coverage and pursue multi-factor authentication for county systems. The presenter characterized the overall premium movement after exposure changes and endorsements as approximately 7.6% for certain lines, while noting that figure reflects several adjustments and may not map directly to year-over-year total premium.
Commissioners asked whether recent claims had been reflected in the quote; the presenter said some claims arrived late in the underwriting process and may not be fully accounted for. Commissioners discussed high-value equipment replacements (new trucks, a loader) and rising repair and labor costs as drivers of insurance exposure.
On storm damage, county staff (Speaker 8) reported that an adjuster team—including an appraiser, a drone operator and a structural engineer—had inspected county properties and found roof damage on many metal-roofed buildings at the fairgrounds, grandstands, museum, airport, road shop and other county facilities. The presenter and staff said the courthouse shingle roof looked good but that the hospital roof and an ambulance shed are likely to generate claims that exceed the $25,000 deductible. Staff said the adjusters will provide written findings and estimates; commissioners agreed to hold off on making repairs until the insurance documentation arrives and to solicit bids where repairs are needed.
Commissioners also raised questions about volunteer coverage and court-ordered work. The presenter said volunteers are described as insured in the county policy, but that coverage for court-ordered work (justice court versus district court orders) can be disputed in some cases and that some carriers and the state fund have taken different positions. The presenter suggested workarounds such as separate group accident policies for volunteers if needed.
Staff and commissioners also reviewed maintenance and service contracts (referred to in the transcript as Norpac/Norpack and allied vendors). Commissioners asked staff to reconcile invoices and determine whether the hospital or the county has paid quarterly maintenance charges in recent years.
County staff said adjusters will provide numeric estimates and that, once received, commissioners and the fair board will decide whether to advertise for bids and authorize repairs. No final repair contracts were awarded at the meeting.
