Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission adopts Columbia Falls rural zoning district after Meadowlake residents urge protections
Summary
The Flathead County Commission on Oct. 14 adopted Resolution of Intention No. 2331C establishing a Columbia Falls rural zoning district after planners and residents debated how the new rules would affect already-approved Meadowlake subdivision plats and lot setbacks.
Get email alerts on the Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Flathead County commissioners adopted Resolution of Intention No. 2331C on Oct. 14 to establish the Columbia Falls Rural Zoning District after a lengthy staff presentation and public comment from Meadowlake residents who urged protections for existing plats.
County planning manager Eric Mack told commissioners the county intends to treat previously approved preliminary and final plats as nonconforming (grandfathered) when documentation shows a building permit had been issued, on-site construction begun, a septic permit exists, or a signed contract or site plan was in place before the county took jurisdiction. "Any building for which a building permit has been issued or if a building permit is not required, on-site construction has begun prior to adoption or amendment of these regulations ... is a nonconforming use," Mack said, summarizing the rule the department will apply.
Two Meadowlake speakers pressed the commission to preserve expectations for buyers who purchased lots under the prior Columbia Falls zoning. "I would strongly encourage that subdivisions that have been approved for preliminary plat and for final plat not be affected by this resolution," said Pete Glee, general manager for Meadowlake Country Club Estates. Barb Riley, who manages the Meadowlake County Water and Sewer District, described a 1979 master-plan process that included sewer-service agreements and a waiver of annexation, saying, "We have a waiver of annexation on the entire subdivision." Both speakers said altering setback rules for undeveloped lots could narrow building envelopes on lots platted years earlier.
Mack reviewed technical differences between county R zones and Columbia Falls zones, noting the county’s R-2.5 choice for some areas was intended to reduce potential density relative to the interim R-3 designation and to avoid requiring public sewer where the county lacks that infrastructure. He described the trade-offs—minimum lot sizes, lot widths, and setback dimensions—and noted developers can pursue variances or annexation and city infrastructure where appropriate.
After commissioners discussed the staff findings, they voted to adopt the findings and then the resolution of intention. The chair called the question and the motions carried. The resolution begins the formal land-use process under county rules; subdivision applicants and property owners seeking to rely on prior Columbia Falls approvals were urged to assemble documentation (contracts, septic permits, building permits or evidence of active construction) to support grandfathering claims.
Next steps: adoption of a resolution of intention initiates the county’s procedural timeline; future actions will include ordinance drafting, public notice and further opportunities for comment and formal adoption under county code.
