Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning Variances topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning board approves three ZBA referrals and CBA variance requests

Stamford Planning Board · February 24, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Stamford Planning Board unanimously approved three referrals: a variance for 36 Congress Street, a rear-yard setback variance at 41 Idlewood Place, and a lot‑coverage/second‑story request at 75 Sea Beach Drive (Anna Blaze); staff noted coastal/runoff concerns for the Sea Beach Drive item.

On Feb. 24 the Stamford Planning Board unanimously approved three items referred to it for comment: ZBA application 011-26 (36 Congress Street), ZBA application 012-26 (41 Idlewood Place), and CBA application 013-26 (75 Sea Beach Drive).

36 Congress Street: Staff summarized that the property has preexisting nonconforming elements and that the proposed additions largely duplicate existing conditions. The applicant’s representative was not present; the board moved to approve the referral.

41 Idlewood Place: William Haid, representing Sharon Axe, seeks to convert a sunroom into a bedroom and bathroom and requested a rear‑yard setback of 24.6 feet in lieu of the 30 feet required. Staff advised this largely formalizes an existing nonconformity; the board discussed runoff concerns and asked staff to consider mitigation but approved the request.

75 Sea Beach Drive: Applicant Anna Blaze said the work would create a first‑floor bedroom and bathroom to accommodate elderly parents. Staff noted the property lies in a coastal management area and stressed runoff and impervious‑surface issues because the proposal increases lot coverage from 49.5% to 51.6%; building coverage, as presented, would remain under 20%. Members encouraged exploring measures to limit runoff. The board approved the variance and included an encouragement to consider impervious-surface mitigation.

All three motions passed unanimously. The planning board’s recommendations are advisory and the relevant boards will take final action as required by ordinance and zoning procedure.