Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Senior Center Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee presses city to resolve $15M dredging shortfall before senior center can move forward
Summary
At its Feb. 4 meeting, the committee discussed timelines for the 165 Miller renovation and a proposed senior center at 116 Cook Avenue, noting dredging estimates of $15–18 million and that the city — not FEMA — would have to cover any shortfall; members urged asking the City Council to add funds to the CIP.
The committee spent the bulk of its Feb. 4 meeting pressing city leaders to resolve a funding shortfall for dredging that committee members say is a prerequisite for building a proposed senior center at 116 Cook Avenue.
Moderator (committee lead) opened discussion by reviewing the status of a renovation grant for 165 Miller and said the committee had submitted the application on time. Staff member said the CIF committee will make recommendations in March and the bond commission will consider the list in March or April, and that the committee should not expect a final award until those bodies act.
Why it matters: Committee members said the dredging work is needed before the senior center can be built on the chosen site and that delays will raise construction costs. "If the city council doesn't wanna pay $10,000,000, $15,000,000 for the dredging, then that means there's gonna be no senior center," Moderator said, urging the committee to seek an early decision from the council.
Staff member told the committee architects have completed the planning-grant contract and produced 60% design drawings, and that if the grant is awarded the work to convert 60% drawings into 100% bid documents will follow. Staff cautioned that auditors now require the city to approve total estimated project costs rather than approving design-only funding in isolation and noted architectural fees can run roughly 10% of total construction costs.
Dredging estimate and funding responsibility: The committee discussed current dredging estimates of about $18,000,000 and a target lowered to $15,000,000 pending final designs. Moderator and staff agreed that FEMA will not pay the dredging shortfall and that any remaining cost would have to be paid by the city through the capital improvement program (CIP) or other borrowing. "That wasn't — that is 100% that Meriden is gonna have to pay for that," staff said when asked whether FEMA would cover the work.
Options and next steps: Staff outlined the budget process and timing: the city manager's proposed budget is scheduled to be presented March 2; council amendments and final finance meetings follow. Staff said that a motion to add $15,000,000 to the CIP could be made by councilors and that corporation counsel (Matt Goldrick) prepares resolutions, not the committee. The committee discussed pressing the City Council to include additional CIP funding sooner rather than later to avoid escalating costs.
Site selection and safety concerns: Members reaffirmed their focus on 116 Cook Avenue after the West Main Street option was rejected. The committee's chair, who identified themself as chair of the commission, raised constituent safety concerns about the site's frontage and asked staff to ensure planned traffic-safety improvements on Hanover Street are implemented.
Outcome and follow-up: The committee agreed to wait for completed dredging designs (expected later in the year) to get accurate final cost estimates and to present those numbers to the City Council. The meeting closed after confirming the next committee meeting on Feb. 18, 2026, and approving a motion to adjourn.
