Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commissioners approve multiple lakeshore permits and an extension, including a 40‑foot boat ramp amendment for the Burkes property

Flathead County Commission · December 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission approved a lakeshore permit extension and an amendment for Burkes (expanding a proposed boat ramp to 40 feet), several shoreline repair and retaining‑wall permits on Lake Blaine and Flathead Lake, and amended the Bridal Divide permit to note existing nonconforming conditions before approval.

The Flathead County Commission approved several lakeshore permits and a permit extension during the meeting, addressing shoreline stability, docks and access structures along Lake Blaine and Flathead Lake.

For Burkes FLP‑24‑79 the board first granted a permit extension after staff said work had not begun. The applicant later requested an amendment because their contractor determined the originally permitted 25‑foot boat ramp "would not be enough to safely launch boats" and sought an additional 15 feet for a total 40 feet. Commissioners expressed caution because the application had cited financial challenges; one commissioner said enlarging the project could increase costs and made clear future extensions would be harder to support if financial constraints persist. The extension and the amendment passed by voice vote.

Commissioners also approved a lakeshore permit for Allison and John Lee to construct a natural stone retaining wall and landscape stairs to stabilize shoreline erosion (staff noted impervious coverage remains within permissible limits), a permit for Jill Davenport and Jim Goetz to repair shoreline slumping and existing seawall/dock maintenance with no footprint expansion, and a Bridal Divide permit that raised process questions because a proposed replacement walkway was 6 feet wide while the code limit is 4 feet. Staff explained the parcel had previously been regulated as floodplain and the walkway may be an existing nonconforming feature; the project description was amended to record the walkway as existing nonconforming development and the permit was approved as amended.

Next steps: staff will finalize amended project descriptions and conditions on the permits, and applicants must follow project‑specific conditions and any applicable mitigation or recordation requirements.