Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board continues 132 King Street partial-demolition request so applicant can provide drawings

Historic Architectural Review Board · October 17, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

HARB continued the application to replace a front window with a door at 132 King St. because the board lacked elevation drawings and visual materials; the owner may return Nov. 21 with drawings or pursue an administrative vestibule solution.

The Historic Architectural Review Board voted on Oct. 17 to continue consideration of a partial-demolition application for 132 King Street (HP20240065) after the board determined the submittal lacked sufficient elevation drawings and visuals showing how a new door would affect the building’s front fenestration.

Staff described the two-story circa-1910 frame building as a contributing property in the Bridge Land Company National Register Historic District and noted the application proposed replacing one of a pair of front windows with a three-quarter-light door to provide direct porch access to a ground-floor unit. The owner and applicant explained the practical and financial reasons for the proposed change, including unit access and rental-market concerns.

Multiple board members said the change risked disrupting the building’s historic rhythm of windows and doors and requested elevation drawings, before-and-after elevations, and details of how the historic paired window would be treated. Board members repeatedly suggested an alternative solution: retain fenestration and create an interior vestibule or make the existing French door match the historic door to provide access without altering the façade.

The owner asked for a continuance to the Nov. 21 meeting to develop drawings and consider staff recommendations; the board granted the continuance so the applicant can either return with visuals or pursue administrative solutions.