Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Privacy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate adopts privacy bill after contentious debate and floor amendment exempting political groups
Summary
The Maine Senate voted to advance LD 18 22, the Maine Online Data Privacy Act, after hours of debate and adoption of a floor amendment (S-528) that creates an entity-level exemption for political organizations; supporters said the bill protects consumers and children, while opponents warned of harm to small businesses and last-minute changes.
The Maine Senate on March 3 accepted the majority report on LD 18 22, the Maine Online Data Privacy Act, after a protracted floor debate and passage of a Senate amendment that narrows the bill—s application.
Senator Susan Carney, the bill—s sponsor, told colleagues the measure "ensures that there are common sense guardrails on the collection and use of our data in the free market, helping to keep Mainers safe and navigate the digital age while giving them greater control over their personal information." She said the proposal limits data collection, protects sensitive categories and minors, and directs the Public Utilities Commission and other agencies to develop implementation details and reporting.
Opponents from both parties raised concerns about economic impacts and the timing of changes. Senator Stewart, arguing against the amendment that emerged on the floor, said, "This bill is completely untenable for those in the political world who rely on our jobs for this data," framing objections around the scope of exemptions and last-minute drafting. Business groups were frequently cited by senators who warned that stricter standards could impose compliance costs and legal uncertainty on Maine firms.
The floor contest focused not only on substantive privacy rules but on a Senate floor amendment, S-528, that adds an entity-level exemption for political organizations (parties, committees and groups organized to influence elections). Sponsors said the exemption reflects First Amendment concerns; critics said carving out political entities would undercut the bill—s purpose and create unequal treatment for private businesses.
After extended discussion, the Senate adopted the Senate amendment to Committee Amendment A by a roll call of 18 to 16. The chamber then accepted Committee Amendment A as amended; the final procedural votes and the bill—s revised language move LD 18 22 forward for second reading.
Supporters emphasized consumer protections and data-minimization, particularly for children, while opponents emphasized implementation challenges for small businesses and the risk of litigation. The Senate set the bill for further consideration on the next legislative day, with additional amendments and stakeholder engagement anticipated.
