Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Utilities topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council weighs new 'special services' water rate to give cemeteries a larger base allowance

Oakley City Council · March 11, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City staff proposed a new 'special services district' water-classification that would give Oakley's cemetery district a 100,000-gallon annual base allowance (presented as a 100,000-gallon monthly amortization, with a base monthly charge shown as $37.32) and one or two overage tiers tied to existing tiered pricing; council set a timeline for more review and a public hearing before adoption.

Oakley City Council on March 11 reviewed a staff proposal to create a new water-rate classification designed to accommodate the unique, seasonal irrigation needs of the city’s cemetery district and similar public-service entities.

Staff explained legal limits on flat, amortized charges and said state law requires a conservation element in any retail water rate structure. To comply, staff proposed a "special services district" classification that would provide a larger base allowance (amortized over 12 months) and retain tiered overage pricing to encourage conservation.

Using 2025 usage data for Oakley’s three cemeteries, staff presented a model that amortizes high summer use into an annual baseline and proposed giving each cemetery a base allowance equivalent to 100,000 gallons. Staff presented the base monthly charge at "$37.32 a month" under the staff proposal; any usage above the baseline would be charged at the city’s current higher-tier rates (tier 3 or tier 4), which staff said are $4.48 per thousand gallons (tier 3) and $11.94 per thousand gallons (tier 4) in the current structure.

Staff noted an operational issue: some meters and accounts appear to be misattributed among the three cemeteries and said meter checks and a public-works review will be necessary this spring to confirm which meters serve which cemetery circuits. Staff asked for council direction and set an adoption timeline: staff requested council pick an option at the March 25 meeting and conduct the required public hearing and adoption before winter overages roll onto the system, noting a target adoption date of about April 15.

Council members discussed whether a single overage tier or a two-tier approach would better protect the cemetery district while preserving a conservation incentive, and they asked staff to invite the cemetery district to a follow-up discussion and to resolve meter attributions before a final vote.