Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Health Governance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Public hearing on consolidating Macon County health services draws residents; no action taken, two health-board appointments approved

Macon County Board of Commissioners · March 1, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Residents and health staff urged keeping medical decision-making with trained clinicians during a public hearing on a proposed consolidated health and human services agency; commissioners took no action on consolidation but appointed two members to the Board of Health.

A public hearing on Sept. 9 drew residents, health department staff and county leaders to discuss whether Macon County should assume the powers and duties of the Board of Health and create a consolidated health and human services board. After a two-hour meeting and public comment period, the Board of Commissioners took no formal action on consolidation but approved two appointments to the Board of Health.

Deputy Clerk Tammy Keezer opened the hearing with a PowerPoint overview of the consolidation proposal and county Attorney Eric Ridenour outlined the goals of consolidation, saying it was intended to reduce interdepartmental “silos” that can lead to inefficiency and inconsistent employee grievance procedures. Ridenour presented a draft resolution for commissioners to review as they decide next steps.

The public comment period that followed featured a string of speakers who urged caution. “We need medical professionals making medical policy decisions and not a board of elected officials,” Lisa Walker said. Several staff and residents urged more time for public review and called for science-based decision-making. Kaleena Keener urged commissioners to “end the culture of fear, favoritism, and cruelty” and to protect county employees and children.

Board of Health Chair Garrett Higdon told commissioners the board had convened emergency meetings since July and taken steps to address policy gaps and communication issues, including improving public contact information and complaint pathways. Higdon said the Board of Health has been working with its commissioner liaison to remediate identified problems.

Following public comment and Board of Health remarks, commissioners discussed the options Breeden had outlined earlier in the meeting — maintain the current structure, or pursue consolidation that would create a Consolidated Health and Human Services Board (CHHS) appointed by the commissioners to serve as the governing board. Commissioners expressed differing views: Commissioner Breeden said he would continue exploring consolidation options, while Commissioner Antoine and others preferred to keep the current structure for now and allow the Board of Health to address internal concerns. No resolution was adopted.

On a related administrative matter, the board conducted paper-ballot votes to fill two seats on the Board of Health. The public-seat applicants included Ava Ammons and several others; the recorded count gave Ava Ammons three votes and another applicant one vote. For the physician seat the transcript contains inconsistent spellings: the applicant is listed once as Michael Toedt but the vote tally and appointment language reference Toedt with a different given name (read as "Mark Toedt") receiving five votes. The board moved to appoint Ava Ammons (general public seat) and Toedt to the physician seat; the motion was approved unanimously. The transcript does not provide a definitive single spelling for the physician-seat appointee; the county’s official appointment record should be consulted for the authoritative spelling.

The hearing and subsequent remarks underscore local divisions about how best to balance medical expertise with county oversight. Commissioners said they will continue conversations and review the draft resolution and other options before taking formal action.

The meeting record shows no formal vote on creating a consolidated health service agency; the next procedural step appears to be further study and potential revision of the draft resolution.