Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Mining Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee approves changes to coal-owner consent and royalties, establishes escrow for unlocatable interests
Summary
A committee substitute for SB 686 would allow mining when three-quarters of coal owners consent, increase minimum royalty to 7%, require operators to reserve funds for unknown owners and repair surface damage, and create an escrow fund to hold unclaimed royalties for seven years.
The Senate Judiciary Committee examined and agreed to a committee substitute for SB 686, a measure intended to address fractional coal-ownership problems that can render coal seams effectively unmineable. Counsel explained that the substitute treats coal estates similarly to oil and gas practice: if three-quarters of owners with mining rights lawfully agree to mining, operations would not be considered waste or trespass even over nonconsenting co-tenants, provided the operator has made reasonable efforts to locate and negotiate with known owners.
The substitute raises the minimum royalty for nonconsenting owners from 6% to 7% of production (with the greater of 7% or the highest royalty paid to any consenting co-tenant applying), prohibits deductions for related mining/processing/transportation costs from that royalty, and obliges operators to reserve funds for unknown or unlocatable owners and remit them to a state-managed escrow fund. Unclaimed funds would be held for seven years and then made available to known cotenants per the substitute’s terms. Operators would also be required to repair surface damage caused by mining.
Senators debated the effects on surface owners, including whether the substitute could permit surface mining that would disrupt a nonconsenting owner’s residence or farm. Counsel and sponsors said the substitute applies to the coal estate and underscored that existing surface-mining statutory protections and consent requirements remain in force; sponsors also noted the substitute mirrors many provisions used in oil and gas law. After discussion the committee adopted the substitute and voted to report SB 686 to the full Senate with a recommendation that it pass.
What happens next: SB 686 will be sent to the Senate floor for further consideration. The substitute frames a path to permit mining where fractional ownership previously blocked development while creating mechanisms to compensate missing or nonconsenting owners and to hold funds for unlocated interests.
