Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Statutory Revision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances package of technical statutory revisions, sending multiple bills to Committee of the Whole
Summary
The State Civic, Military and Veterans Affairs Committee voted unanimously to advance a bundle of statutory‑revision bills that correct cross‑references and remove outdated language across Colorado law; most measures drew little debate and moved to the Committee of the Whole with favorable recommendations.
The Colorado House State, Civic, Military and Veterans Affairs Committee advanced a package of largely technical statutory‑revision bills to the Committee of the Whole on unanimous or near‑unanimous votes.
The bills addressed drafting errors and out‑of‑date citations in state law, sponsors said, and did not change policy. Representative Espinosa and Representative Bradley presented several measures that correct internal cross‑references in the child support guideline statute, repeal obsolete statute sections that lack sunset dates, and update statutory language in multiple titles to reflect prior legislative changes.
Representative Espinosa described House Bill 26 12 17 as a correction of cross‑references in the child support guidelines made necessary after major changes enacted in 2025. Lucas Knudson, senior policy advisor for the Division of Child Support Services, testified that the bill “does not include any substantive changes to how child support obligations are calculated” and asked the committee to approve the fix so agencies can implement prior reforms accurately.
Representative Bradley described HB 12 95 as a package of repeal provisions removing statutory duties and task forces that no longer have repeal dates, and said drafters had identified sections that are no longer necessary. He also guided bills that update administrative references in behavioral‑health licensing, remove antiquated ‘‘Blue Book’’ language used by legislative staff, and clarify online marketplace notification obligations in response to recent statute changes.
Where witnesses were not signed up, the committee moved measures without public testimony. Several bills were moved to the Committee of the Whole with favorable recommendations and recorded as passing on unanimous polls (common counts: 11–0 or 10–0 with one excused), according to the chair’s announcements. Committee members said the statutory‑revision committee’s role is to align statute text with legislative intent and not to change policy; members repeatedly described the measures as housekeeping.
The committee adjourned after completing its calendar and making logistical announcements about the next meeting location.
