Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Courts & Public Safety committee hears flooding, board-role and medical examiner concerns; sheriff flags bond-practice changes
Summary
At the Courts & Public Safety Committee, a resident reported property flooding and trespass; a Medical Care Board member sought clarity on board member roles; the Mid Michigan Medical Examiners Group reported a rise in death investigations including suicides; and Sheriff Craig Mast described increased use of PR bonds.
Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Courts & Public Safety Committee met July 10 and heard public concerns and agency reports.
Rick Poole of Mears described flooding and trespass problems at 4887 N. Sand Hill Dr. near Cedar Point Park, saying road work and a new trench had directed water onto his property and damaged bridges and culverts. Chairperson Tim Beggs said he would take Poole’s contact information and try to help coordinate a response, and noted Mr. Robert H. Walker identified as the Road Commission liaison would look into the situation.
Dale Danes, a board member of the Oceana County Medical Care Facility, asked whether a formal job description exists to define board members’ roles and responsibilities. Danes said prior boards regularly attended weekly management meetings and he believes current members should have clearer guidance. Chairperson Beggs said he would seek information and report back.
Lisa Kaspriak, Administrator for the Mid Michigan Medical Examiners Group, presented the 2024 annual report, saying the office handled 86 death investigations (a 5.4% increase from the prior year) and noting suicides increased from five to eight cases. Kaspriak said toxicology screens increasingly show alcohol, cocaine, fentanyl, xylene, THC and methamphetamine and recommended developing a new system to track suicides.
Sheriff Craig Mast reported a busy Fourth of July weekend and said his office received 34 inmates; all but one were released on personal recognizance bonds, prompting ongoing discussions with the magistrate/judge about bond practices and the balance between release and court-return assurances.
