Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Discipline topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parent urges VISD to overhaul threat-assessment practices after son's arrest
Summary
Two public commenters told the Victoria ISD board that a 10-year-old's arrest resulted from a misapplied zero-tolerance response and called on the district to retrain staff on threat assessment, McKinney‑Vento protections and disciplinary procedures; they said requested records have not been provided.
Michelle Daugherty and Kristen Alonzo urged the Victoria Independent School District board on Nov. 20 to review its threat-assessment and discipline practices after Alonzo's 10-year-old son was arrested and detained overnight.
"This was not an appropriate school safety response," Michelle Daugherty said as she read comments on behalf of Alonzo, alleging the district logged the incident as a terroristic threat while omitting the child's repeated clarifications that he referred to a Nerf toy, not a weapon. Daugherty said the child's clarifications were offered to classmates, teachers, the vice principal and the arresting officer but were not reflected in the district's documentation.
Kristen Alonzo, who spoke directly to the board, said the family has suffered lasting harm and described ongoing costs for counseling. "0 tolerance does not remove the necessity for professional judgment, contextual analysis, or the application of common sense," she said, adding that the district's response increased instability for her child and undermined trust in school staff.
Alonzo asked the board to require district retraining on threat-assessment procedures, McKinney‑Vento protections and the relevant provisions of Texas Education Code Chapter 37. She said she has submitted a records request to the VISD communications department and that the 10-day statutory threshold for an initial response had passed; she told the board she is prepared to release recorded statements and a timeline to corroborate the family's account.
Board members acknowledged the comments and did not take immediate action at the meeting. The public-comment sequence closed after the two speakers, and the board moved to its scheduled agenda items.
The board did not vote on policy changes during the meeting; Alonzo's comments request administrative retraining and records production as next steps. If the district responds with records or an administrative review, the board could consider follow-up at a future meeting.
