Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Grievance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
McKinney ISD board votes to approve motion on a level 3 student appeal after closed-session review
Summary
At a special meeting, the McKinney Independent School District Board of Trustees moved into closed session to hear a level 3 appeal filed by Brian and Nicole (name spelling uncertain in transcript) and, after returning to open session, approved a motion related to that appeal by voice vote; the transcript records the motion text as garbled and a roll-call tally was not recorded.
At a special meeting Monday evening, the McKinney Independent School District Board of Trustees convened, adjourned to closed session to hear a level 3 student grievance, and after returning to open session approved a motion related to that appeal by voice vote.
The chair opened agenda item 7 to "consider and take possible action regarding the level 3 appeal" filed by Brian and Nicole (the transcript records uncertain spellings) on behalf of their student under board policy FNG(Local). The board cited the Texas Government Code, chapter 551, including sections recorded in the transcript as 551.082, 551.071 and 551.074, as the legal basis for consulting with the board attorney in closed session.
The chair made a motion on the appeal; the transcript records the wording of the motion as garbled and not fully intelligible. After brief comment from trustees, including the chair — who said, "This has been educational for me ... I'm very proud of Henry" — the board voted by voice. When the chair called for "All in favor, say aye," members responded and the chair concluded, "Motion carries." The transcript does not include a roll-call vote or tally by name.
Trustees emphasized student welfare and procedures during the discussion. A separate trustee (recorded as a committee member in the transcript) said student welfare "is most important" and urged that policies and procedures be followed so "our parents are a part of that process." The board noted familiarity with 504 procedures during the discussion.
The board proceeded to review future meeting dates and confirmed adjournment after a motion to adjourn carried by voice vote.
Details that the transcript does not supply: the precise wording of the motion as recorded on the meeting minutes, any roll-call vote totals, and the final administrative steps the board will take following the vote (for example, whether staff will implement a specific remedy or whether a written decision will be issued) are not specified in the transcript. The transcript also includes multiple spellings of the parties’ names (the record alternates among "Spark," "Sparky," and "Skarky"), so this article uses the spelling exactly as the transcript provides and notes the uncertainty.
