Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Trustees propose broad redlines to board operating procedures; plan follow-up
Summary
Trustee Landrum and colleagues presented multiple suggested edits to the board operating procedures, ranging from agenda‑setting rotation and consent‑pull timelines to training and committee rules; trustees requested redlined language and agreed to return the item as an action item for more detailed consideration.
Trustees spent an extended portion of the Feb. 17 meeting reviewing and debating proposed edits to the board operating procedures, with Trustee Amber Landrum offering a large set of suggested clarifications and additions and the board asking administration to prepare a redline for return discussion.
Landrum’s proposals included formalizing a rotating trustee invitation to the agenda‑setting meeting (to train newer trustees), clarifying deadlines for requesting consent‑agenda pulls consistent with legal posting timelines, codifying a preference that student speakers be given priority during public comments, rephrasing Robert’s Rules expectations to "have a strong working knowledge," and restoring a clear section on standing and ad hoc board committees and how they are established and sunset.
Trustees debated training and budget transparency. Landrum urged that the full board review its training allotment and trustee budget annually rather than the president alone, and recommended removing a requirement that a board officer must attend out‑of‑state training with a trustee. Trustee Weir and others raised questions on how to implement a trustee rotation for agenda review without creating quorum issues or burdening trustees who cannot attend because of work schedules.
Process and next steps: the board president said the item will be returned as an action item with redlined language rather than placed on consent. Trustees asked administration to research other districts’ language on mid‑year reorganization of officers and to prepare clarified page‑by‑page redlines before the next meeting. Trustee Landrum also requested that the item not be placed on consent so trustees could review the full package and discuss it again.
No final policy vote was taken. The board agreed to continued work and a future action item presentation.
