Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Facilities Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board told Gateway building is unsafe and slated for demolition; trustees say community notification fell short
Summary
Staff advised trustees that the Gateway campus building has severe structural, ADA and life‑safety deficiencies and recommended demolition of the most deteriorated 1946 building; several trustees said community members were surprised and upset that demolition was underway and asked staff to improve communication.
District staff presented a separate report on the Gateway campus, emphasizing that this project is not funded by the bond and describing significant deferred maintenance and life‑safety problems. Presenters said the campus has roofing and structural failures, non‑compliant egress, no elevator between floors, inaccessible restrooms and hazardous materials that together would cost more than $7 million to remediate.
“Given those conditions, we wouldn't want to invest any resources into an aging building like that,” a district operations official said, explaining that the main 1946 building alone was estimated at a little over $4 million to bring up to standard and that the district had concluded it could not safely or responsibly keep the building in service.
The staff presentation said the district planned a September demolition of the identified building and that the remaining campus buildings are intended to remain for online learning while the site is reconfigured. Staff emphasized that no bond funds are associated with the Gateway Project.
Several trustees pushed back on community outreach. One trustee said community members learned of a “last tour” of the old building via social media and had been surprised to learn it would be demolished, adding, “I think we did have a failure of communication on a multitude of levels there, and I think we owe more to them.”
Staff acknowledged the communication gap and said staff and facilities leaders had been responding to community inquiries and would improve notifications to board members and the public about demolition timing going forward. Trustees asked for clearer public language (for example, avoiding phrases such as “going offline” that might be misunderstood) and for the district to continue direct outreach with Gateway community leaders.
What’s next: staff said they would continue community communications and are available to meet with community members who request more information; the board did not make a separate policy decision about Gateway during the meeting.
